Archive

Archive for February, 2012

New letter from Younus Muhammad (Prisoner)

February 27, 2012 Leave a comment

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته

I am writing this to let the ummah know that I have arrived on extradition from Morocco to the United States, while it is impossible for me to communicate at this time, I did want to express my gratitude to all of those that have assisted myself and family throughout this trial.
I have posted and edited version of a document penned in Morocco that explains my situation, but you must know that while the conditions of Muslims incarcerated in America resembles Guantanomo at home I maintain belief both in Allah’s decree and the principle that Allah knows best what we all need. He ( Subhana wa Ta’ala) says:
مَا أَصَابَ مِن مُّصِيبَةٍ فِي الْأَرْضِ وَلَا فِي أَنفُسِكُمْ إِلَّا فِي كِتَابٍ مِّن قَبْلِ أَن نَّبْرَأَهَا إِنَّ ذَلِكَ عَلَى اللَّهِ يَسِيرلِكَيْلَا تَأْسَوْا عَلَى مَا فَاتَكُمْ وَلَا تَفْرَحُوا بِمَا آتَاكُمْ
وَاللَّهُ لَا يُحِبُّ كُلَّ مُخْتَالٍ فَخُورٍ

No misfortune can happen on earth or in your selves but it is recorded before we bring it to existence. That is easy for Allah. In order that you may not despair in matters that pass you by, nor exult over favors bestowed to you.. ” (57.22-23)
My heart goes out to the prisoners and their families and all the muslimeen. I would still like to ask those of you that can help in any way to assist my wife and children. They can be contacted at knasri1982@gmail.com. To those of you that have assisted, then words alone do not suffice to express my gratitude. This ummah has provided me with the family I never had and it is in my love and passion for you that I grow everyday in this gift of Islam. I love you all so, so much.
The historical alterations of the last year document at once both the inspirational desire for change and the depravity of our present condition.
Allah’s messenger (SAWS) said ,” The ummah is like one body, if a part of it hurts then the whole body hurt” and one important identification to draw from recent events in the heart of the Muslim world is that it is representative of the whole; everywhere and anywhere we are in chains, shackled not so much by the external, but by an internal clash of civilizations.
More than a century of colonialism has completely destroyed that role of Islam in politics, economics, and legislation, but it is the enduring Islamic identity at the level of civic society that generated movement for change and, the ire of the proponements of neoliberal globalization. As societies everywhere grow tattered, far away from Islam, we must push forward posing our system as a paradigmatic alternative and that can only come with the awareness that we must return to follow the prophet Muhammad and his companions ( RAA).

Islam took a shy, quiet and contemplative man and thrust him into a conflict with the whole of his society. The legacy of our prophet ( SAWS) is found in the foundations of men and cultivated character that led his wife (RAA) to categorize his (SAWS) character as the Quran itself. if we can just base our thoughts, actions and decisions on the book of Allah and help each other through trials and tribulations then a similar foundation will be laid today that will generate true victory for coming generations.
In each and every time, the Muslims must preserve the legacy of Muhammad (SAWS). shortly after the death of RasuAllah that great scholar Abu Huraira ( RAA) would go to the marketplace and scold the consumers of medina exclaiming, ” The estate of Allah’s messenger is being divided and you are here.”
“Why do you not go to claim your share?” He would then point them toward the masjid and when the people would then point them toward the masjid and when the people would return they would inform him there was nothing being distributed so he would call their attention to the students studying law and silent in prayer and tell them, ” How foolish you are, for that is the messenger of Allah’s legacy!”
I dreamed of being able to bring able to bring up my two boys on such a method of discovery, but one thing I have learned is that when one Muslim falls another fills the void and we must all act wherever we are to be family to each other. So, I ask you all to get involved in advancing the role of Islam wherever you may be, The concept of change in Islam does not stem from the many but the chosen from the many but the chosen few and that is the spirit that leads to Allah’s victory.
I ask you to help the families of the prisoners and pray that the legacy of the prophet ( SAWS) is preserved in the family I leave behind. We do not get much good news these days as Muslims and the last year brought some significant losses so I wanted to close with a poem to try and inspire the hearts and keep your pressing forward. I call it ” Allah’s Soldier”

The soldier perched his penchant for peace
at the first sign of the invasion
left his house to enter a fold
likeminded and prone to persuasion
The forces were fierce, the enemy strong
The nightwatchmen could not contain them
Their numbers were few, their weapons old
The hypocrites sent a liason
The troops grew divided and the war grew long
but our soldier maintained concentration
He had embarked and could not go home
Without safety for his nation
The infantry fell so he marched alone
Ignoring the conflagration
The enemy fire consumed his soul
But he inspired the next generation…
….The soldier perched his penchant for peace
at the first sign of the invasion
He has now fallen but our nation has hope
A result of his dedication
Your brother in Islam
Younes Abdullah Muhammad

Here is a link to brother Younes Abdullah Muhammad’s explanation about his arrest.
Seeking Clarification: A Reaction to my Arrest for South Park Opposition

Categories: Politics Tags: , , , ,

SOLITARY CONFINEMENT

February 23, 2012 Leave a comment

SOLITARY CONFINEMENT:
A FIRST-HAND REFLECTION ON DOMESTIC TORTURE IN A TIME OF TERROR
Younus Abdullah Muhammad

They locked me in this room, Alone, by myself, just me –
With no one to talk to except for the walls, or the face in the mirror I see.
So I sit, listen, and watch
the television in my head
Not a notion to move nor a second spared
I record everything that is said –
Absence of Kindness, Distinct Memories of Pain
Caused by the things that they took away
So I’m holding my breath,
until they let me out
But I’m afraid of what might happen the next time I breathe.

I wrote that poem when I was 17. These days I am living it; all over again. Then it was a proverbial prison. I was a conscious youth inside one of the most dangerous institutions of America: the public high school. Today, 16 years later, I am in another – the U.S. prison system where I am but one of a growing number of Muslim Americans who dared to speak out. Today I am a pretrial federal inmate housed in solitary confinement and in conditions that best resemble those of Guantanamo Bay.

Trust me I am not alone. In 1994, my junior year of high school, the U.S. Justice Department announced that the prison population had reached one million. By 2009, that number had more than doubled to 2.3 million with 5 million more on probation or parole. U.S. citizens now represent only 5% of the global population but account for 25% of the world’s prisoners. Additionally, 1 in 15 Americans is in “extreme poverty” with 48% of Americans labeled “in poverty” or “working poor”, but a recent Gallup poll documented that the percentage of Americans that realizes the levels of poverty are so high has dramatically decreased. These two seemingly distinct sets of statistics suggest something more sinister is going on.

The civil rights era included prison protests like the Attica riots of 1971 and paved a way for productive reform, but today talk of human rights tends to cover a manipulative compromise with the power elite and diverts attention away from structural cause. Generally prisoners today have enhanced rights and services but like the starving people fed by NGO’s in Africa or refugee camps in Afghanistan, such rights and philanthropy are counterproductive where they allow society to ignore the root causes of such appalling levels of crime, punishment, hunger or war. These contradictions become apparent with regard to civil liberties in a time of confrontation, when the citizen is reduced to an object of propaganda about domestic enemies in order to maintain public support for wars abroad.

The authors of the American constitution unanimously resented any sacrifice of civil liberties in the name of national security, but the reaction to 9/11, the immediate passage of the Patriot Act and a new approach to law enforcement the Bush Administration called a “preventative paradigm” ushered in an order of sustained national liberty sacrifice. These changes disproportionately affected American Muslims however while “terrorists” abroad were “disappeared”, water boarded and held without charges at Guantanamo Bay, the courts approved warrantless wiretapping, ethnic profiling, blacksite rendition and preventative detention targeting Muslims on America’s shores. Wartime propaganda alongside a wave of arrests utilizing entrapment, where undercover agents encourage fund, and coerce potential terrorist attacks, have helped to sustain support. Recent polling documents that two-thirds of Americans support sacrificing some privacy and freedoms in the fight against terrorism.

In many ways, these sacrifices pose serious risks to important principles of the rule of law. A recent report by Muslim Advocates entitled Losing Liberty claimed, “The Patriot Act opened the floodgates to a plethora of discriminatory and invasive laws, policies and practices in the name of national security of which Muslims and those perceived to be Muslim have borne the brunt.” To emphasize the danger, a recent AP investigation revealed that the CIA and NYPD have collaborated on a huge monitoring program targeting New York City Muslim populations.

One such derivative of these broader realities is the use of solitary confinement as a means of punishing Muslim prisoners before trial. The objective is to torture and enforce silence while pressuring detainees to accept pretrial plea agreements that prevent any future appeal on constitutional grounds. The use of solitary confinement remains mostly undocumented in the public realm, but the maintained use of such repressive practices poses potentially severe ramifications for the future of dissent in an increasingly polarized American society.

On December 20, 2011 Tarek Mahenna was found guilty by jury of 7 terror-related charges. He has been in solitary confinement for over 2 years. The primary evidence consisted of translated documents from Arabic to English, videos of Al-Qaeda, and proof of Tarek’s speaking out against U.S. war. His friends, family and community supported him even after the media initially painted him as a crazed terrorist. The jury found him guilty but many of us know he is innocent; I once gave a speech on his behalf about FBI entrapment within the Muslim community and I remember looking into his father’s sorrowful eyes while the audience remained largely unmoved. Tarek remained in isolation and we all went home, but as American society continues to deteriorate and he marches on (see Freetarek.com) I continue to wonder who remains more free.

Bush’s “preventive paradigm” was marked by the case of Jose Padilla, a U.S. resident initially detained in military custody after 9/11 as an alleged member of an Al-Qaeda sleeper cell. He was tortured and held in solitary confinement without family contact for over 18 months. By the time he presented for trial and was asked by the judge whether he was tortured he could only explain “I cannot answer that question sir, that is a state secret.” He was deemed an “enemy combatant.” I watched on T.V. as Americans celebrated the day he was convicted, a victory in the war.

Just this past month 700 page, bipartisan Defense Appropriation Bill stirred some controversy as one of its amendments granted indefinate detention without trial to anyone deemed an “enemy combatant.” Critics claimed the legislation was so broad it could be applied to American citizens captured overseas or even those arrested domestically for crimes of war. The White House threatened to veto but only because it limited the executive branch’s “flexibility” in avoiding the protections of the Geneva Convention. A White House statement read, “Congress must be careful not to open a whole new series of legal questions that will distract from our efforts to protect the country.” The document has become law and was modified slightly but will preserve the President’s ability to rendition and torture abroad. Jose Padilla remains in solitary confinement and Guantanamo has yet to close.

In 2006 U.S. Citizen Dr. Aafia Saddiqui was miraculously discovered in Afghanistan in possession of plans to commit terrorism abroad. Speculation surfaced about whether she was a woman secretly housed in the notorious prison of Bagram where former fellow prisoners had reported the abuse and rape of a female detainee. I watched in the New York City courtroom when her lawyer requested the judge send her to a facility in Minnesota where it could be determined if she was Bagram’s secret prisoner. Instead, the judge denied the request and she remained in solitary confinement strip searched and invaded for 2 years. She was eventually convicted for shooting a U.S. officer with an automatic weapon. She weighed 86 pounds when she allegedly fired the gun and is now serving 82 years. The media called her “Lady Al-Qaeda” and few will ever learn of the torture she endured in secret prison when she disappeared.

In 2005, Dr. Ali al-Timimi was convicted of counseling others to levy war against the U.S. and its allies. He told a few Muslims in the aftermath of 9/11 that it was permissible to defend Afghanistan from invasion. The men flew to Pakistan but never fought and eventually came home. I watched as he rejected a U.S. plea offer for 20 years on principles that he could not plead guilty to acts he did not commit. Today he is serving a life sentence and so few of us even remember his name.

Dr. al-Timimi’s case was one of the first post 9/11 cases that violated the landmark freedom of speech case from 1969 – Brandenburg vs. Ohio. In that decision the Supreme Court ruled that, “advocacy of the use of force or of law violation,” cannot be punished unless it is, “directed to inciting or promoting imminent lawless action and is likely to produce such action.” The case set the standard for First Amendment protection but quietly state and federal courts have failed to apply it in the post 9/11 era and have thus revoked the standard that once made American freedom of expression the envy of the world.

There are many others I have not forgotten. Dr. Omar Abdul Rahman was sentenced to life in prison for allegedly advocating the first World Trade Center attacks in 1996 when an FBI informant provided real explosives. He was convicted solely on the basis of speech, was held under pretrial “special administration measures” and has remained for years in solitary confinement. His lawyer, Lynne Stewart, would also be convicted on material support of terrorism charges and sentenced to 10 years for releasing a statement from Abdul Rahman claiming he had removed his support for a ceasefire between Islamists and the U.S. backed Mubarak regime. I was in the courtroom the day she was sentenced but never imagined that it would happen to me.

Along with the increasing numbers of convictions for material support of terrorism have come the development of what are known as Communication Management Units or CMU’s. These are prisons inside of prison designed to prevent political prisoners from contact with the outside world. The majority of inmates are Muslim but several non-Muslim activists have also been detained. Such Orwellian conditions highlight a general threat posed by a series of legislation like Joseph Lieberman’s 2007 Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Act which proposed such a broad definition of “radical” that almost anyone opposed to U.S. policy at all could fit the bill. All of these realities are mostly undiscussed in the mainstream press.

Fahad Hashmi was arrested in 2006 at Heathrow Airport and held for extradition to the U.S. where he would be charged with sending socks to “terrorists” in Pakistan. The U.S. Government would request Special Administrative Measures and placed him in pretrial solitary confinement for several years. In 2009, in a full courtroom, he accepted a government plea bargain of 12 years. As he read a statement to the judge his hands trembled and his lips stuttered “I am sorry but I haven’t been around people like this for a long time” he explained. Fahad Hashmi resides in a supermax prison where every single prisoner stays in solitary for years.

The European Court of Human Rights has stopped extradition to the United States from the United Kingdom on the presumption that detainees would be housed in solitary confinement thus constituting torture and inhumane detention. Almost all the cases brought before the court deal with Muslims. Still, we all remain in solitary with virtually no opposition on U.S. shores.

There are tens of thousands of inmates in American prisons in solitary confinement. The United Nations Human Rights Committee says that prolonged solitary confinement is torture, hands down. The idea is sensory depravation. When you isolate someone in a cell, restrict lateral vision and limit contact with the outside world, senses are exasperated, creating the conditions of a paradoxical realm, where limited sensorial experience is magnified.

In 1965 psychiatrists confined 65 people to isolatory conditions with goggles over their eyes, plugs in their ears and confinement to a chair. After only 48 hours, 5 of 65 had acute anxiety disorders. One was hysterical, another epileptic, and all of them diagnosed with extreme anxiety. Under today’s conditions these states are induced over time and psychiatric observation documents sustained symptoms such as insomnia, hallucination and claustrophobia persisting long after release.

After extradition from Morocco, I arrived back on American shores and have remained in solitary confinement for 90 days so far. A review of American history documents that suppression of speech and repressive silencing of dissent has always accompanied U.S. involvement in foreign wars. However, the Global War on Terror is now ten (10) years old. Where in the past the immediate curtailment of freedom and liberty was restored as U.S. military engagement prevailed, contemporary engagement in the Muslim world remains and has now successfully depleted every aspect of American power other than military might. The latest burst of dissatisfaction and the rise of rebellion both here and abroad suggest that these repressive legal practices may have to become engrained in the social fabric of a “democratic” police state, where the number of prisoners forgotten in the Gulags hides another area the U.S. remains exceptional in the world.

Secretary of State Hilary Clinton recently revealed the founding principles of this “Authoritarian” democracy in an interview with PBS’s Jim Lehrer on the Arab Spring. She said, “We are always better off on the side of democracy but we have to keep our eyes wide open. It wasn’t long ago, during the Cold War, that if somebody was elected, somebody we didn’t like, we took some action. We are for democracy that embeds democratic principles…” principles like discrimination against Muslims, pretrial torture, extraordinary rendition and disdain for human rights.

The young man upstairs was 17 when he made the YouTube video that landed him here. There are growing numbers of us across this great land. I remember reading a quote back in high school that also stuck with me unto today from Martin Niemoller who lived to tell of his experiences in a Nazi concentration camp. He said, “When the Nazis came to the Communists, I was silent. After all I was no Communist. When they took the Jews, I was silent. I am no Jew. When they arrested the Social Democrats, I was silent. I was no Social Democrat. When they came to take me, there was no one left to protest. We remain in solitary confinement but there are millions left to protest.

Deep within the Belly of the Beast, my heart yearns to be free
But I’m afraid of what the world may be like the next time I breathe.

Younus Abdullah Muhammed is a Muslim American and Master of International Affairs presently residing in solitary confinement in Virginia. He is the founder of Islampolicy.com and can be contacted by emailing Islampolicy@gmail.com

The Syrian regime’s WAR against Islam & Muslims of Syria – Muhammad Al-Arifi

February 22, 2012 1 comment

A very important lecture to watch. Please support your brothers and sisters suffering in Syriya any way you can.

The Syrian Regime's Crimes on Muslims

Free Will & Predestination (Al Qadaa Wal Qadr)

February 21, 2012 1 comment

Source: http://islamqa.com/en/ref/34732/free%20will

What is the meaning of belief in al-Qadar (the divine will and decree)?.

Praise be to Allaah.

Qadar means that Allaah has decreed everything that happens in the universe according to His prior knowledge and the dictates of His wisdom.

Belief in al-Qadar includes four things:

1 – The belief that Allaah knows all things, in general and in detail, from eternity to eternity, whether that has to do with His actions or the actions of His slaves.

2 – The belief that Allaah has written that in al-Lawh al-Mahfooz (the Book of Decrees).

Concerning these two matters Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Know you not that Allaah knows all that is in the heaven and on the earth? Verily, it is (all) in the Book (Al‑Lawh Al‑Mahfooz). Verily, that is easy for Allaah”
[al-Hajj 22:70]

In Saheeh Muslim (2653) it is narrated that ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Amr ibn al-‘Aas (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: I heard the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say: “Allaah wrote down the decrees of creation fifty thousand years before He created the heavens and the earth.”

And the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The first thing that Allaah created was the Pen, and He said to it, ‘Write!’ It said, ‘O Lord, what should I write?’ He said: ‘Write down the decrees of all things until the Hour begins.” Narrated by Abu Dawood, 4700; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood.

3 – The belief that whatever happens only happens by the will of Allaah – whether that has to do with His actions or the actions of created beings.

Allaah says concerning His actions (interpretation of the meaning):

“And your Lord creates whatsoever He wills and chooses”

[al-Qasas 28:68]

“and Allaah does what He wills”

[Ibraaheem 14:27]

“He it is Who shapes you in the wombs as He wills”

[Aal ‘Imraan 3:6]

And He says concerning the actions of created beings (interpretation of the meaning):

“Had Allaah willed, indeed He would have given them power over you, and they would have fought you”

[al-Nisa’ 4:90]

“If your Lord had so willed, they would not have done it”

[al-An’aam 6:112]

All events, actions and happenings occur only by the will of Allaah. Whatever Allaah wills happens, and whatever He does not will does not happen.

4 – The belief that all things that happen are created by Allaah in their essence, their attributes and their movements.

Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Allaah is the Creator of all things, and He is the Wakeel (Trustee, Disposer of affairs, Guardian) over all things”

[al-Zumar 39:62]

“He has created everything, and has measured it exactly according to its due measurements”

[al-Furqaan 25:2]

And Allaah tells us that the Prophet of Allaah Ibraaheem (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to his people:

“While Allaah has created you and what you make”

[al-Saaffaat 38:96 – interpretation of the meaning]

If a person believes in all these things then he believes correctly in the divine will and decree (al-qadar).

Belief in al-qadar as we have described it above does not contradict the idea that a person has free will with regard to actions in which he has free choice. He can choose whether to or not to do things that he is able to do of acts of worship or sinful actions. Sharee’ah and real life both indicate that people have this will.

With regard to sharee’ah, Allaah says concerning man’s will (interpretation of the meaning):

“That is (without doubt) the True Day. So, whosoever wills, let him seek a place with (or a way to) His Lord (by obeying Him in this worldly life)!”

[al-Naba’ 78:39]

“so go to your tilth, when or how you will”

[al-Baqarah 2:223]

And He says concerning man’s ability (interpretation of the meaning):

“So keep your duty to Allaah and fear Him as much as you can”

[al-Taghaabun 64:16]

“Allaah burdens not a person beyond his scope. He gets reward for that (good) which he has earned, and he is punished for that (evil) which he has earned”

[al-Baqarah 2:286]

These verses confirm that man has a will and the ability to do what he wants and not to do what he does not want.

With regard to real life, everyone knows that he has a will and the ability to do what he wants and not to do what he does not want. And he can distinguish between the things that happen when he wants them to, such as walking, and those that happen without him wanting them to, such as shivering. But the will and ability of man are subject to the will and decree of Allaah, because Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“To whomsoever among you who wills to walk straight.

And you cannot will unless (it be) that Allaah wills the Lord of the ‘Aalameen (mankind, jinn and all that exists)”

[al-Takweer 81:28-29]

But the entire universe is the dominion of Allaah, and nothing can happen in His dominion without His knowledge and will.

And Allaah knows best.

See Risaalat Sharh Usool al-Eemaan by Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen.

Islam Q&A

%d bloggers like this: